• Innovation Ads – Innovating No More

    Comments

    It is being reported that Innovation Ads has closed and ceased operations in the online lead generation space. Emails from now former employees went out to their former clients, saying “I’m not sure if word has gotten to you yet, but yesterday, Innovation Ads closed, and terminated all of it’s employees.” The emails unfortunately also delivered some bad news, namely that companies are now saddled with potential losses because of presumably now unpayable invoices.

    Innovation Ads has long and colorful history in the space. I was unaware that Capital Source Finance of Chicago was the majority owner. Founded in 2002, the company was acquired by Seaport Capital in 2006. The press releases stated, “This was a strategic move carried out by Seaport Capital in order to compliment its earlier acquisition of Direct Response Media, Inc. (DRMI), a full-service agency specializing in direct response television. Seaport Capital has created Think Media, a holding company that will preserve the autonomy of Innovation Ads and DRMI, while creating the opportunity for collaborative direct marketing endeavors between the two entities. This heavy-weight amalgamation of unique talent promises to be the premier direct marketing solution for advertisers.” Whatever it was, kudos should go the investment bank. The majority owner of Innovation Ads now, according to those closer to the company, is not Seaport but Capital Source Finance of Chicago.

    Prior to the acquisition, Innovation Ads did not have a reputation for high quality… this according to feedback from the schools. More recently, though, it seems as though the company had turned the quality corner and for some schools was starting to be seen as a preferred vendor. Those we talked to (on the buy and sell side) liked dealing with them.

    A big question looms around the future of UMUC (University of Marlyand University College) from whom Innovation ads was the Agency of Record. I suspect there are some pretty excited other firms who would like to take over the relationship with such a marquee brand.

    Best of luck to the team there. We wish them well.

    News & Analysis
  • BrokersWeb.com Expanding into the Auto Insurance per-Click Marketplace

    Comments

    Looking at Quinstreet’s market cap recently, you might presume something is wrong with the business. They are trading almost one-third off of their peak and almost twenty percent below their IPO. Yet, stock analysts who cover the sector estimate nothing but continued growth. Some of this selling of the stock is a result of perceived exposure to the Department of Education’s ongoing process to overhaul portions of the Higher Education Act. It’s a complex topic that is even more complex the further one is from an educational institution. The uncertainty and complexity hasn’t helped education institutions, most notably the for-profit education companies and those who service them like Quinstreet.

    The online education business might comprise the largest segment of Quinstreet’s business, as it was their primary line of business. But, education does not represent their fastest growing segment, financial services does. For those with some familiarity with Quinstreet’s business, financial services means SureHits, the auto insurance click marketplace the company acquired several years back. The SureHits business differs fundamentally with the cost-per-lead approach of Quinstreet’s online education business and with the cost per lead approach favored by a large number of other marketing services firms in insurance such as Netquote, InsWeb, and AllWebLeads.

    Outside of the obvious, namely that vertical click marketplaces charge on a click basis, vertical marketplaces have other differences that many advertisers favor. An advertiser in a vertical click marketplace owns the conversion experience. A common complaint of lead aggregators is that buyers do not know from where the leads come – what was said in the steps of the funnel up to their acquiring the name. In the click marketplace, they own the ad, the landing page, and are responsible for the conversion. The ultimate cost per lead could end up much higher than through a lead aggregator, but it is the only option for many brands who have policies against leads. The marketplace is all about control, and judging from SureHits success, there is something to be said for vertical marketplaces as an alternate vehicle in the quest leads. But, they are not for everyone. If you do not have expertise in online advertising, you will find yourself spending a lot for little in return.

    This week brings news of a new entrant into the vertical click marketplace for auto insurance – BrokersWeb. Those in the health care space most likely know BrokersWeb by their HealthCare.com brand and their additional owned properties HealthInsuranceFinders.com, HealthCare.org, MedicareSupplemental.com, MedicareSupplement.com, and LifeInsurance.org. In addition to owned properties, they also have robust network of highly-targeted website distribution partners. (HealthCare.com purchased the BrokersWeb assets in Q3 2008 and has grown them 5x since – primarily through partner distribution). As you can see from the domains, the company goes deep into the health care vertical, and it is my understanding too that they are the only solution for those niche health insurance sub-categories, i.e. Medicare Supplements, Group Health Insurance and Dental Insurance. Prior to this week’s auto insurance launch, life insurance was the most recent, launching in 2009 and buoyed significantly by the organic traffic coming through the highly ranked LifeInsurance.org.

    Auto insurance may not seem like a logical next step for a company with deep health expertise, but from a market perspective, it is the exact right choice. Everyone who drives needs it, i.e. a large overall market, relatively high natural churn so advertisers must spend to grow, and those insured with one company can switch to a new carrier with less friction than cell phone. Plus, there are a lot of major brands spending for direct access to customers – perfect for a vertical click marketplace. As such, it’s a logical next step for a company with an operating history in vertical click marketplaces. Like any entering, there is still the classic chicken and egg scenario of having enough buyers and sellers. Distribution partners will want high CPC’s, and advertisers will want to see quality before coughing up the high CPCs. It’s a slow process, and simply saying, we’re doing it doesn’t mean both sides will come. Luckily, there is enough latent demand from both that BrokersWeb stands a good chance of speeding up this process in order to become a viable player, and they are kicking off the launch with several high profile players on each side at launch. This includes top-tier bidders such as GEICO, Esurance and The Hartford on the advertiser side and AutoInsurance.com and OnlineAutoInsurance.com on the distribution side. We wish them luck as it’s always good to see growth in the space.

    Company Reviews, News & Analysis
  • Buyer / Seller Chicken and Egg

    Comments

    As an advocate for the online customer acquisition industry, I want to see more buyers buying leads. Without buyers, the industry can generate all the leads it wants, but it would be a virtual spinning of the wheels. Consumers aren’t helped, and generators lose not only financially but more so because they can’t help the user. We saw this with mortgage lead generation during the financial crisis. The supply of leads didn’t diminish; the ability to service those leads did.

    “Coverage” is a topic in and off itself, but in short coverage refers to a generators ability to sell leads regardless of location. National brands generally mean greater coverage. There are only so many large, national brands though. For many of the growth areas of lead generation, coverage comes from a greater number of buyers who buy smaller amounts of leads, often with greater restrictions (time of day, geography, etc.). Connecting buyers and sellers is a little bit of a chicken and the egg. As a seller, you want to get paid for your leads, especially as there was a cost to generate them. As the buyer, you don’t want to get ripped off.

    It’s a game of trust that to date has left a bad taste in many people’s mouths when an imbalance occurs.  For an example of the chicken and the egg, read the below, shared by a buyer in a newer vertical (non-mortgage, non-edu):

    With [redacted], they want our business and [redacted] is dealing with someone.  The issue there is that they want 5k up front committed funds.  We have no problem sending them 5k.  Our problem comes in that if they send us a bunch of garbage, we want the ability to cancel and get a refund on the unused balance.  So far, we have been unable to accomplish this.  So, I was hoping to get [redacted] a contact that might waive this provision.  We have been burned a few times by companies promising good leads only to send bad leads.  We have no problem testing a company for 1k or so to see how they do but 5k is a hefty test to take a chance on given our experience.  Make sense?

    Chicken and egg considerations:

    • Pre-pay vs. credit – This is ultimately dictated by leverage. The bigger player gets to decide on average. If you are Quicken Loans, you get to pay on credit. If you are Google AdWords, you get advertisers to pay upfront with a credit card until they reach a certain size. There is no right answer. But, the onus is more on the seller than the buyer. If a seller wants pre-payment (assuming they do not have a credit card, auto-charge system), they and the seller must come to an agreement regarding the product and expectations. That is really the key.
    • Trust – When two parties have an established working relationship, what they really have is trust. If you are a buyer, you know that you will receive a certain quality product, and more importantly, you have assurances of what will happen if those conditions are not met. As the seller, you want to know that the buyer won’t just use you for free product. You also want to know that the buyer won’t blame you for their shortcomings, e.g., too busy to call on all leads, not trying leads more than once, expecting 100% close ratio, etc. Trust is the aim, but trust must be earned. The barrier for trust can be low ($1k versus $5k), and both sides need to earn it.
    • Refund, Refund, Refund – I’m a big believer in a good refund policy. A good refund policy is not whatever the buyer wants, nor is it draconian restrictions. It’s just like buying merchandise at a store. The best retailers generally have some of the best refund policies. Why? Because they believe in their product. The same should be true here. If a seller has a good product, they can afford to stand behind it. Those that require high pre-pays with poor return policies don’t mean they are bad. They too could have been burned by buyers, but I still think the onus is more on the lead generator than end buyer.
    General Thoughts
  • Pondering the Future of the For-Profits

    Comments

    Education lead generation has for lack of a better word been on a tear – an absolute bull market in an otherwise bearish economy. Lead volumes alone do not tell the full story. They tell of the success of lead generation and of the school’s growth, but they do not tell about the broader perception of the industry.

    Historically, marketing and the market could operate quite separately. If a marketer, it helped to understand the market you served, but not being a vertical expert didn’t stop you from generating leads in a particular category. Generally, those with greater vertical expertise scaled larger than those who did not. The vertical expertise enabled them to talk shop with their clients and create more effective ads because they understood the nuances. That vertical expertise also meant a greater awareness of the issues surrounding the industry. Except, until now, that hadn’t been an issue. Vertical expertise was really about talking shop not as a means for staying out of trouble.

    The landscape is dramatically changing; yet, it feels like too many people in a position to influence enrollment (namely those who touch consumers) do not appreciate the seriousness of the situation and the scrutiny under which the industry has come. The average affiliate, responsible for 10% to 25% of all leads, does not see the connection between their actions and the 70 Billion dollar / year education industry. They view the world only in terms of conversions. From their perspective, the industry doesn’t extend beyond their ability to generate a lead. Their job is the lead. The advertiser’s job is after that, and if the advertiser doesn’t empower them to create conversions, they take matters into their own hands.  They say to themselves, “What’s the big deal,” and “No one will really care.” They then create misleading ads like this one.

    Cops-ad

    Even we, who have been following the more developments closer than the average person (namely the 2008 Higher Education Opportunity Act and subsequent negotiated rule making process), find making sense of the processes, time lines, institutions, and acronyms confusing. Ads like the above, the countercyclical success of the for-profit industry, and the re-examination of government funds has lead to the every so-often re-examination of the for-profits.  Almost every major publication has run a piece on the topic, but this same complexity that makes it tough for us to summarize makes it just as tough for others to as well, especially if education is not their focus. The pieces, though, are becoming more frequent, and one in particular came out that initially had those who lean towards for-profit education growth nervous.

    Frontline, the documentary series on PBS, ran an expose titled, “College, Inc.,” a piece that given the generally tone of most public broadcasting seemed as though it would turn out as a roast of the for-profit sector. It wasn’t quite roast, but for those who care enough to understand the issue but need to see something, this is for you. The Frontline piece (6 segments online) is just under an hour long in total and worth every minute. Watching it and reading this post from Higher Ed Watch, will help any marketer understand those with misgivings about the for-profit space. If I could, I’d make this required viewing for any lead seller, especially those for whom education is not their primary focus. Below is Part 1.

    Perhaps the best quote in the piece comes from a former Director of the University of Phoenix who from the sound of it made millions during his tenure through mostly equity growth. He quips, “What makes education so special” and compares the spending and profit margins of schools to perfume. Not his best moment. And he says what most marketers know – that they must advertiser; to succeed, the schools “have to get people’s attention.” If you believe education should not be a business, you’re reading into that as a prime example of a system that is broken.

    Some other facts from the piece:

    • The typical for-profit schools spends double on marketing than what it does on teaching
    • For-profit education is not cheap; a degree costs 5x a typical community college and 2x state schools. The degrees are not far off from the typical private liberal arts school, leading to the comparisons of what you get for your money.
    • The for-profit sector has a lot of financial backing; they have investors who expect certain returns, the implication being that they must not only grow fast but charge as much as possible
    • Sector also has to spend a lot because they have to add a lot of students per year to keep pace with all that theylose
    • Not mentioned but worth mentioning is if this were an other big ticket item, there wouldn’t be as much sensitivity, but it’s education so talk of sales tactics and business growth will unsettle many people
    • The sector represents 10% of the total higher education student body but consumes 25% of all student aid, i.e. a much larger than average reliance on tax dollars, and roughly 20bn loans are generated each year to the for-profit
    • Regional accreditation is key, and the financial community values that alone at $10mm; regional accreditation is what enables a school to qualify for student loans. It’s the key for unlocking federal funds.
    • The criticism is that accreditation is treated like a tax badge, able to be bought indirectly when a struggling not-for-profit agrees to go for-profit.
    • One school charged 30k for a 12 month program for nursing without the students ever stepping foot in a hospital; they are suing as no one will hire them
    • The for-profits might be 10% of all college students, but one person estimates it is responsible for 44% of all student defaults
    • Mandate by Obama – by 2020 America will have the highest percentage of college graduates. Community colleges can’t fulfill that. The for-profits will have to play a role
    • It’s all about student loans. They aren’t like other loans. If you default on a federal student loan you are “hounded for life.” It’s the “most collectible debt” – non dischargeable in bankruptcy, wages can be garnished, tax refunds intercepted, you can be sued in court and ineligible for other federal benefits. In other words, it’s a serious thing when agreeing to one, and 20bn are being generated each year. The should go to only people qualified and with an understanding of what they are getting into. When marketers use language
    • Outstanding student loans equal the nation’s credit card debt, 750bn. We got into a credit crisis among other reasons when people were given credit who were at risk from the start of paying it back. That’s the issue here with student loans, especially from the for-profit sector; could it contribute.
    • “You can’t be afraid of going into business because of regulation risk, “Jack Welch, who invested in a for-profit and lends his name to one of the graduate degrees.

    As Secretary of Education Arne Duncan says, there is nothing inherently wrong with for-profits providing education. The focus now is on making sure the practices are honest and that the students and especially taxpayers are getting value for their investment. High pressure tactics, deceptive actions, and dishonesty is what the Department is challenging in a very serious way. Again, we will see just how serious the challenge is and if the new rules suggest he believes that nothing is inherently wrong.

    News & Analysis
  • The New In-house Guru? A Lead Quality Officer

    Comments

    Needle

    Today, at almost every organization large and small who spends money online, you will find if not an entire team dedicated to search, then certainly at least one in-house expert focusing on it. For those working in the online space, that wasn’t necessarily the case three years ago, and it certainly wasn’t common five or more years ago. That such a role has developed and become both commonplace and essential is one of the many neat developments that have transpired as the internet has evolved. The same holds true for social media experts. More and more companies need them, but there isn’t a

    In online lead generation space, a new such role is starting to exist – that of a lead quality expert. We haven’t quite hit the point yet where companies will think of having a Chief Lead Office, but it wouldn’t come as a surprise if one came to exist in the near future, especially at companies whose main source of revenue comes from either the generation or purchase of leads. Until then, we are starting to see the seeds of its predecessor, a role that for lack of a better title could go by Lead Quality Expert, Lead Quality Guru, or what I suspect will take shape, Lead Quality Manager.

    David Rodnitzky wrote about the need for a Lead Revenue Officer in his Quick Hits piece on LeadsCon, saying, “‘Lead quality’ is just a metaphor for ‘revenue from leads.’” I think David’s correct, but perhaps his view is a little too advanced. The majority of people understand the need for quality, but they cannot separate out in practical sense the notion of quantity from revenue. When you talk about making more money, the knee-jerk reaction is still to look at that from a volume perspective. If viewed more holistically, though, making more money off leads would span not just quantity metrics but quality as well.

    A talk of quality is nothing new, but that doesn’t mean organizations have truly aligned themselves towards acting on it. Actions of quality mean having treated lead quality just like any important function in the business with a combination of technology, expertise, and process implementation. That can’t happen until someone at the company lives and bread lead quality. To date, it is generally someone who takes on lead quality as an ancillary function to their current job, or  a developer handed Targus Info or eBureau technical documentation and expected to make it happen. You wouldn’t find that at a company who spends meaningfully (to them) on search has their search spend handled by someone whose job function encompasses more than search. And, so it should become the same with online lead generation.

    There is too much money to be made, and there is already too much money being spent, for companies who aren’t currently aligned to maximize lead quality and thus revenue not to. In slightly easier to read English, if a company spends more than a full-time person’s salary buying or selling leads, it such consider having a full-time resource dedicated to maximizing quality. This is especially true for companies who spend hundreds of thousands of dollars and millions of dollars per year in online lead generation.

    For those with an analytical mind and a technical enough bent, this is a great chance to craft a role that doesn’t have any prerequisites. You get to be a pioneer and becoming an expert in this will pave the way for countless opportunities that we can’t imagine today. Not to mention, you”ll help make the industry that much better.

    General Thoughts, Lead Quality
  • Altius Education

    Comments

    Altius Education Logo

    Many companies have entered the for-profit education sector, especially those looking to generate leads. Few other online segments offer such attractive economics. The online lead generation space, certainly with respect to education, has few barriers to entry, requires a rather low amount of capital intensity, and success doesn’t require becoming class leading. It only requires one to perform incrementally better than the next provider. None of these are inherently wrong. They simply explain why so many who enter the online education lead generation segment focus on becoming a lead provider to the schools. As we see in the Quinstreet IPO filing, execute well, and a company can earn well north of a hundred million dollars annually servicing the sector. And, Quinstreet is not the only one. The race for the number one spot in education lead generation revenues is much closer than most think. There are three if not four in the $100mm club for online education lead generation. If you were going to enter the online education arena, wouldn’t you just operate a similar business? Not if you are Paul Freedman and his newest venture, Altius Education.

    Altius, as we found out from Founder and CEO Paul Freedman is Latin for “higher”, which makes the company name a clever, yet clear, description of their focus – the world of higher education. For another clue about Altius’s model, it helps to know something about the focus of the lead investor, Maveron who along with Spark Capital put an eye-opening $8 million into Altius’ Series A round. Maveron, as many inside the world of investing know, was co-founded by Howard Schultz, the man who has built in Starbucks one of the most recognizable brands in the world. His passion for consumer brands drives Maveron’s investment strategy. If a company doesn’t touch consumers, they don’t invest, which explains why many of Maveron’s investments are, in many places, also household names – from the super swanky Pinkberry to education leader Capella University. Such a large captial raise, though, would not have been possible were it not for Paul, the entrepreneur behind Altius. Unlike the dot com boom in the 1990’s where a sock puppet and a dream could get funding, serious money today requires a track record. Paul’s began in college during which he built a site for for people to do homework without going to the library. His was a natural language engine during a time when when the majority of reference material consisted of Microsoft Encarta at best. By the time they built up scale in traffic, the monetization had dried up, at least from an ad revenue perspective, so they retooled the technology to go from b2c to b2b, licensing it to universities. It enabled schools to have an automated knowledge base that students could tap to answer their questions. Schools needed it because in almost one admissions cycle, user behavior went from phone calls or letters to emails and web traffic.

    AcademicEngine, as it was known at the time, was sold to Hobsons in 2004, and Paul stayed on to lead its development through 2008. During his tenure, he noticed a pattern in the higher education space. More year students were choosing two year programs as a pathway to a four program, while traditional four year schools were both rejecting more students while increasing their appetite for junior transfers. There was and is a demand problem, but from a supply side, the two year programs, primarily community colleges, weren’t necessarily addressing areas for high economic demand post graduation or focusing on the matriculation process. More interesting than the problem was how Paul decided to solve it. He decided that he would focus on online education but innovate on the current supplier model. And, this where the need for a large amount of working capital comes into play. Altius partners with traditional non-profit who currently do not a strong online presence, or in any in most cases no online presence. Together, the non-profits and Altius form a for-profit company under a new brand with the school providing the content and professors, leaving Altius the rest, primarily the technical back-end and making sure the school has resources and processes in place to make sure leads become students. The schools get to focus on what they do best with Altius making sure that there are digital butts in seats.

    Ivy Bridge College Logo
    Altius’ first partnership was with Tiffin University, and together they created Ivy Bridge College of Tiffin University. Already, the new school has matriculation arrangements with 24 traditional schools where those graduating from Ivy Bridge are ensured admission. Ivy Bridge and the two newest programs being publicly announced January 2010, are all mission thematic. They build programs that are as Paul says, “not in the belly of the curve,” and he believes that the Altius approach will lead to better content, more engaged students, and ideally, better jobs. If the early indicators can tell us anything, they most likely tell us that Altius stands a good chance. In their first year of operations, they have enrolled 500 students; these are people who filled out a lead form, then an application, met the requirements for admission, scheduled their courses, and then actually began taking classes. Their lead to enrollment rate is not much higher than the industry average, more importantly, their term on term student retention is five times higher. Naturally, the test will be to see how it scales. Regarldess, it’s an impressive venture. We hope they succeed because it helps the world of education and lead generation. We thank Paul for sharing, and you can meet Paul at LeadsCon Las Vegas 2010.

    Company Reviews
  • Spotlight on: Jordon Keltz

    Comments

    seniorsforliving

    “It all started above a deli in Staten Island.” And so begins one of the lesser known and more  intriguing stories in the world of online lead generation, one that has resulted in not just one successful exit but potentially three. Junkies of online lead generation will know the name ClassesUSA, and they will know it not for some of its innovative work on display today but for owning display before anyone, even the schools themselves, understood that it could be done.  And, it all started above a deli in Staten Island.

    The story which is today SeniorsForLiving.com began in 2000 when Jordon Keltz, who ran an internet consulting company ,became introduced to Luciano Rammairone, the founder of CollegBound. Today, they rank among the largest of online lead generation providers, easily in the top there, but in 2000, CollegeBound was an offline business, a series of publications for students and adults interested in higher education. Web guy meets education guy. They name their online venture ClassesUSA. The rest is history. Right? If only it were that easy. And, if it were that easy, the story wouldn’t be nearly as interesting.

    The year 2000 was early for online education lead generation, but it wasn’t early for several of the larger for profit institutions. Apollo Group’s University of Phoenix for instance had just entered its third decade of existence, but unlike today, where liquidity / monetization for those entering the marketing of online education, there was no field guide for ClassesUSA aka “Classes.” Their first site in fact had none of the usual suspects that we find on today’s online education properties. Luciano knew he wanted to create an online business, hence partnering with Jordon and creating Classes. But, with neither knowing what exactly that entailed what do you do? In their case, the logical choice was creating a showcase of classes that could be taken online. And rather than compensation occurring on a per lead basis, they received payment on a per transaction level. These weren’t degree programs but vocational courses; think of it as an early version of EduFire.

    Site built. Next was traffic, and this is where things start to click into place for amateur historians. In 2002, Jordon made a deal with MSN for placement. This wasn’t a straight banner deal but a more robust integration of their content and course listings. It was a cpc deal for MSN, where clicks on the courses would earn them money. It was still an arbitrage play for ClassesUSA, because they only received payment on a purchase. What they didn’t know at the time was that this deal and style of placement would become one of the best things that happened.  He certainly would have guessed it when they were losing money each month over month. But that would soon change, and it would change the entire focus of their business as well.  The placement attracted the attention of AIU who saw the Classes content as a natural fit for its certificates. That AIU wanted to pay on a lead basis was an initial stumbling block for a company that operated on an ecommerce model, but they went ahead and tried it.

    Not long after, Jordon found himself hearing from Capella and the University of Phoenix. They too had seen the site, and now with AIU on there, they wanted placement as well. And, it was then that the business started to shift. Leads worked. They went from losing money to making money, and even better they had the premier entities coming to them as opposed to the other way around. The content deal started working too well in fact. Jordon negotiated a cap on the number of clicks they would pay out to MSN. After that cap, it was pure profit. Around the time that they began renegotiating the deal was the time that MSN introduced PerformancePlus, their display on a CPA program that was open to a select few big spenders, one of whom was Classes. Now, they started running individual school ads on display and on other placements throughout the site. And, guess what happened when they put Phoenix on the home page? Everyone wanted the same – from schools to other aggregators. The gatekeeper to that traffic for a period became Classes and on the path to exponential growth.

    The next step became to own all of elearning on MSN, which they did, and then to apply that formula to other properties. Jordon proceeded to create a partnership with AOL, and in the next two years, he had crafted arrangements with almost all job and career sites. In 2005, Experian gave Classes an offer they couldn’t refuse, becoming part of Experian Interactive along with LowerMyBills and AffiliateFuel. Jordon moved Classes from its Staten Island headquarters that they shared with Luciano’s other business, CollegBound Network to the city, Manhattan. At about the same time, an old client from pre-Classes days was pitching a lead generation idea to him that Jordon invested in, and when his contract with Experian ended, he decided to take over the helm and apply his learnings to the senior housing lead generation space… which brings us to SeniorsForLiving.

    The online lead generation space for seniors is a fascinating and tantalizing one. It has all the right makings for a successful vertical – a large audience (boomers and their parents), a high ticket price (senior housing is not cheap), a transactional component, and a decision that requires follow-up, i.e. you don’t buy it online. As any who has tried to get into a new vertical can tell you, it’s a grueling process. There is a huge sales undertaking as you work to get coverage for the leads and as you work on educating buyers who in the past haven’t used leads as part of their business. It is according to Jordon where education was about ten years ago. There are some national brands that buy leads, but the mid to long tail isn’t there. And, senior housing lead generation is more akin to ground schools lead gen as a physical presence is needed. If there is anyone who will have success beating down doors, though, it’s he. A key to success he tells me is making sure institutions understand performance based marketing is the way to go, and trying to institute some online dna into marketing teams that are often focused only offline. Sounds familiar to many, I’m sure.

    Overall, Jordon is sticking to the formula he knows and believes in – user choice and exclusive leads. Their model focuses on a portal based approach where everything relies on the user making informed choices and understanding what happens next. That user doesn’t fill out a generic form but one for a specific institution. Not new to the game, SeniorsForLiving is focusing on quality of leads. As for traffic generation, they have made themselves very publisher friendly, and given what he did in the past, I wouldn’t be surprised if there weren’t some interesting partnerships in the works.

    Company Reviews, Marketing Strategies
  • News Brief: Quinstreet Files for IPO

    Comments

    quinstreet logo

    A name known to many but a company still unknown below the surface, Quinstreet announced plans to raise $250mm in an IPO and trade under the symbol QNST.  Having had their founder and CEO, Doug Valenti, on a panel at LeadsCon, it was a first opportunity for many of us to get a feel for their operation. There are volumes to be said on this, and a more detailed post is coming. If only we were part of the ex-Quinstreet list serv. Overall, a tremendous day for online lead generation, and we should all congratulate and thank Quinstreet, as a successful IPO will help list the entire industry and practice. Not everyone likes them, but for now, we should all root for them.

    Here is what I wrote on my personal blog:

    The day many of us have been waiting for (including Quinstreet) has arrived – the Quinstreet IPO. After years of speculation and some unanticipated market twists, Quinstreet announced its intention to go public, filing their S-1. For a company that has been incredibly secretive closed lipped, the S-1 is an amazing look under the hood of one of the most intriguing companies in the online lead generation space. It details their acquisition history, and while many of us knew about their acquisitive nature, none would have expected it to include more than 100 purchases with at least four eight figure deals. The Quinstreet today is no longer an education lead generation business. They are a roll-up and have been a source of liquidity for countless smaller publishers who sites earn revenue through lead generation. And, today they are a diversified play with some large client concentration but only 50% of the business being edu.

    Much more to be said on the topic.

    News & Analysis
  • Subscription Service Upsells – In The Line of Fire

    Comments

    Ask just about anyone in the online customer acquisition space to define an “upsell,” and instead of blank looks, out 10 people you survey, you’ll get roughly 10 similar answers. It’s business practice as old as just about business itself and a crucial way for many businesses to make additional revenue. Extra value meals? An upsell. Care to start with an appetizer folks? Upsell. Look around they are everywhere offline and not surprisingly, online too. The market is sufficiently large that multi-hundred million dollar per year companies exist specializing in helping a wide variety of sites, from lead gen sites to branded commerce sites make more. The lower the margin business you run, the more you rely on upsells. A classic example comes from the online lead generation world. When email was a more viable option for generating additional revenues, many companies would run their ads at almost break-even to a loss, just so they could get address and mailing revenue.

    What’s another business known to run at extremely low margins? The travel industry, especially those offering airline tickets. Now, with most online travel agencies (Orbitz, Expedia, etc.) waiving fees on purchases, they make next to nothing. It’s why their affiliate programs pay out something like 4% of revenue on good day. The airlines themselves, aren’t exactly doing wonderfully themselves. So, it’s no wonder each has various ways of upselling users who convert. If you’ve booked on Expedia, in addition to being asked if you need a hotel or car, you will find yourself scrolling through countless activities available in your destination city. I can’t blame them. Those actually make them money unlike that flight you just bought. Frequent purchasers of tickets and ad junkies, will recall another upsell as well.

    Here is the image of my recent booking for LeadsCon Las Vegas being held Tuesday, February 23 and Wednesday, February 24.
    Itinerary

    Notice something on the far right hand side? It’s a $50 cash back incentive.
    Upsell

    For years, I can remember seeing a button like this one after I make a purchase on a variety of sites, especially airline sites. And, it’s this button that has come under fire, with a press release being issued by the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. The release is below, but title tells enough, “Chairman Rockefeller Requests Information from Web Retailers in ‘Mystery Charges’ Investigation.” Read the list of companies who received a request for information, and those in our space will quickly connect the dots, or in this case,the button. The list reads like a who’s who of Adaptive Marketing and Webloyalty’s biggest customers. The key to their success and the publishers is something that the direct marketing industry refers to as Card on File. You’ve just made a purchase. They now have your credit card details. That makes an upsell easier and more rewarding because a purchase related upsell, generally a subscription service, is more lucrative than a data/form based one.

    Here’s how it looks today. Click on the button, which has disclaimer language underneath, and you go here, to Reservation-Rewards. This site is not run by the airline/online travel agent. It is run by Webloyalty, a company that specializes in running subscription services, with their largest acquisition channel being online upsells. This is the same company and type that you would have seen offering these same subscription programs as an insert into your credit card bill. Sending an email telling someone to get $50 their next purchase and hoping they convert doesn’t work nearly as well as someone who just purchased.
    Reservation-Rewards

    Scroll to the bottom of the page, and here is what the conversion process looks like.
    webloyalty-terms

    Mystery charges? In this exact case it’s no mystery, but I can remember not too long ago where the distinction between offer and signup didn’t have this level of differentiation. The button didn’t have the full disclaimer and the sign-up process for the consumer didn’t require additional opting-in. Webloyalty and Adaptive Marketing have faced these issues before, especially related to their telemarketing practices when calling on behalf of credit cards and others with card on file. They’ve weathered the storm, but the results of this investigation could impact the online lead generation space as well. Given how little the broader world understands this type of upselling, it’s not hard to imagine them generalizing.

    Regardless of the outcome, it’s a gray area. The companies doing card on file upsells in the past haven’t been angles. Since then, though, their practices are effective, but they haven’t been scandalous. The unfortunate truth is that I’m sure they do receive a higher than desired (by an outside governing body’s point of view) rate of people signing up who later didn’t recall doing so. Why would they? It’s an impulse purchase from a generic name. That’s the nature of the beast. That’s human nature, and there comes a point where you can only ask the companies to do so much and need to start demanding that the consumers take more responsibility. I’m sure I’d feel differently if the situation were reversed and I was paying $49.99/month+ and having difficulty canceling.

    Copy of the release:

    Chairman Rockefeller Requests Information from Web Retailers in “Mystery Charges” Investigation
    WASHINGTON, D.C.—John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV, Chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, continued the Committee’s investigation into controversial “post-transaction” online business practices by sending letters yesterday to 16 e-retailers that appear to be involved in these practices.
    Since May 2009, the Committee has been investigating three e-commerce companies—Affinion, Vertrue, and Webloyalty—to better understand their business practices on the Internet, which have been the focus of criticism by consumer advocates and have generated thousands of complaints by individual consumers.  Chairman Rockefeller continued this investigation yesterday by sending information request letters to sixteen companies that have apparently allowed Affinion, Vertrue, and Webloyalty to present membership club enrollment offers to their online customers and have agreed to pass their customers’ credit card or debit card numbers to Affinion, Vertrue, and Webloyalty.
    A list of the companies that received a request for information is included below:
    1-800-FLOWERS.com, Inc.
    AirTran Holdings, Inc.
    Classmates.com, Inc.
    Continental Airlines, Inc.
    FTD, Inc.
    Fandango, Inc.
    Hotwire, Inc.
    Intelius, Inc.
    Movietickets.com, Inc.
    Orbitz Worldwide, Inc.
    Pizza Hut, Inc.
    Priceline.com, Inc.
    Redcats USA, Inc.
    Shutterfly, Inc.
    US Airways Group, Inc.
    Vistaprint USA, Inc.
    News & Analysis, Press Releases
  • Google Comparison Ads – What It Really Means

    Comments

    After two years of development, a teaser beta in the UK last year, and a potential lawsuit seeking to derail its US release, Google’s internally groundbreaking initiative that allows (for now) mortgage banks to buy not just clicks but a request for contact has launched. Called Google Comparison Ads, the product signals a huge directional shift inside of Google (one towards vertical development of their core search monetization) and a potential huge disruption to the online lead generation world.

    Google Comparison Ads Ad

    In classic Google style, the announcement came via one lone blogger and their Inside AdWords blog. I’m still convinced that posts for the Inside AdWords blog are re-written by a specially trained team in Japanese culture who know how to say one thing but mean something very different. Taken at face value, the words sound pleasant, almost complimentary, but translated into their real meaning, they would come across quite differently. The Comparison Ads announcement is no exception. The post, like almost any focusing on improvements to the algorithm speak about value to the user and a more qualified lead for the advertiser. What they are really saying is that the vast majority of those spending money today don’t do a good job. Not surprisingly, those within the online lead generation space have had a lot to say, and the voices represent some of Google’s longest, biggest spenders who can tell you that it was hard enough to spend effectively on Google without actually having to compete with them.  Both sides, not surprisingly, have many valid points.
    google-comparison-ads-results

    (Photo credit: DoublePositive Blog)

    Google Comparison Ads for mortgage is what every mortgage lead generator should have built but didn’t. (Read excellent non-partisan overview of the product from Nick Hedges of Leads360, who like LeadCritic, has hands-on mortgage industry experience.) And, it is because they didn’t build it that Google did. Saying that they should have built it doesn’t tell the whole side of the story. Should doesn’t mean could, and could is what separates Google from the aggregators whose results they displace. Dealing with Google is like dealing with the IRS. If they want something done, it gets done. Ignore the complexities involved with the actual quoting, and let’s focus on the buyers of the leads. Want lenders to buy anonymous leads, e.g., ones without the user’s real phone number? Want lead buyers to be ok with that phone number being tracked and the number deactivated after a while? Good luck being any other company who tries the same. It takes a Google to do it. Comparing others to Google or having them held to Google’s standards is itself a slight double standard.

    Concerns about Google’s global positioning aside, we have an immense amount of respect for what was built, because it forces everyone to elevate their game and keep delivering a better product. This will cause some pain now but that Google speaks about leads is only a long-term benefit for lead generation. And not only do we respect the product, but we really respect the people who built it as they have lead generation and mortgage lead generation in their DNA.  First choice for many would be to not have Google enter, but since they did, at least the product was created by someone any in the industry would trust.

    As Google (indirectly) said in their announcement post this is just the beginning. Here are our takeaways on what Comparison Ads means:

    1. This is not about mortgages – a point we made when covering the Moretech / Lending Tree suit which blew the lid off the Google lead gen product, mortgages is the first vertical. But, it’s not even about verticals so much as Google’s stance on the way form-based lead generation is conducted today. There is a reason a landing page with a form can never get a 10 quality score. Forms themselves aren’t bad, but Google doesn’t like them to be the first and only goal. The user doesn’t click on an ad for “Compare Rates” because they want to see a simple thank you page and hear the phone ring. They want information, and if we can’t do it, Google will.
    2. It still has to monetize – Google can’t lose money on their inventory just because they want to deliver a certain experience. If Google Comparison Ads do not help Google make more money, they will not continue to receive the premium placement. The same holds true for the lead buyers. They don’t hate the current ecosystem and so long as they spend money, don’t count out the current aggregation marketplaces.
    3. It won’t work for everything – comparison ads work for things that can be compared; it requires standardized data and a more of a commodity product. Loans in general are a great fit as are credit cards and insurance. We weren’t the first to say or think that Bankrate got lucky by being taken private. Almost all verticals can use improvement, but the type of game changer created for mortgage isn’t as applicable to many service based industries.
    4. Lead generation is not Google’s DNA – this platform works amazingly well for mortgages and financial products. But, not only is it no sure thing for many others, outside of a really small team, Google doesn’t get lead generation. The companies who do, and those who can add a marketing services + aggregation function, still have lots of growth ahead. Buyers aren’t going to stop wanting face to face meetings, hand holding, and golf outings. Comparison Ads is a game changer but not a category killer.
    5. It’s just one spot – Google can’t capture every click and every conversion. They won’t stop taking money from others, and they aren’t marketers. That leaves many chances for others to continue to spend and capture those users who, as we all know, don’t actually want to do any work. They just want to fill out a form.
    News & Analysis

  • LeadsCon
  • DoublePositive
  • LeadPoint
  • Your Ad Here



  • Recent Comments:

    • FrankVendola: Sisco, The Department of Labor told me that we have to wait 15 days from the 1st to file a complaint. I...
    • Francisco_pool_shark: francisco was here ..what this company did is uncalled for and it should not be tolerated. i...
    • FrankVendola: Dr. Sanjaya Addanki,Ex-C.E.O. Innovation Ads233 Plaza Real, Boca Raton,Florida, USA415-420-0176 July 1,...
    • Dave: You were right . . .Credit cards were next. When is insurance coming?http://adwords.blogs...
    • nikiscevak: Hey Jay, yep still based in Sydney but make my way over to the US a few times a year.