• Archive for June, 2010

  • BrokersWeb.com Expanding into the Auto Insurance per-Click Marketplace

    Comments

    Looking at Quinstreet’s market cap recently, you might presume something is wrong with the business. They are trading almost one-third off of their peak and almost twenty percent below their IPO. Yet, stock analysts who cover the sector estimate nothing but continued growth. Some of this selling of the stock is a result of perceived exposure to the Department of Education’s ongoing process to overhaul portions of the Higher Education Act. It’s a complex topic that is even more complex the further one is from an educational institution. The uncertainty and complexity hasn’t helped education institutions, most notably the for-profit education companies and those who service them like Quinstreet.

    The online education business might comprise the largest segment of Quinstreet’s business, as it was their primary line of business. But, education does not represent their fastest growing segment, financial services does. For those with some familiarity with Quinstreet’s business, financial services means SureHits, the auto insurance click marketplace the company acquired several years back. The SureHits business differs fundamentally with the cost-per-lead approach of Quinstreet’s online education business and with the cost per lead approach favored by a large number of other marketing services firms in insurance such as Netquote, InsWeb, and AllWebLeads.

    Outside of the obvious, namely that vertical click marketplaces charge on a click basis, vertical marketplaces have other differences that many advertisers favor. An advertiser in a vertical click marketplace owns the conversion experience. A common complaint of lead aggregators is that buyers do not know from where the leads come – what was said in the steps of the funnel up to their acquiring the name. In the click marketplace, they own the ad, the landing page, and are responsible for the conversion. The ultimate cost per lead could end up much higher than through a lead aggregator, but it is the only option for many brands who have policies against leads. The marketplace is all about control, and judging from SureHits success, there is something to be said for vertical marketplaces as an alternate vehicle in the quest leads. But, they are not for everyone. If you do not have expertise in online advertising, you will find yourself spending a lot for little in return.

    This week brings news of a new entrant into the vertical click marketplace for auto insurance – BrokersWeb. Those in the health care space most likely know BrokersWeb by their HealthCare.com brand and their additional owned properties HealthInsuranceFinders.com, HealthCare.org, MedicareSupplemental.com, MedicareSupplement.com, and LifeInsurance.org. In addition to owned properties, they also have robust network of highly-targeted website distribution partners. (HealthCare.com purchased the BrokersWeb assets in Q3 2008 and has grown them 5x since – primarily through partner distribution). As you can see from the domains, the company goes deep into the health care vertical, and it is my understanding too that they are the only solution for those niche health insurance sub-categories, i.e. Medicare Supplements, Group Health Insurance and Dental Insurance. Prior to this week’s auto insurance launch, life insurance was the most recent, launching in 2009 and buoyed significantly by the organic traffic coming through the highly ranked LifeInsurance.org.

    Auto insurance may not seem like a logical next step for a company with deep health expertise, but from a market perspective, it is the exact right choice. Everyone who drives needs it, i.e. a large overall market, relatively high natural churn so advertisers must spend to grow, and those insured with one company can switch to a new carrier with less friction than cell phone. Plus, there are a lot of major brands spending for direct access to customers – perfect for a vertical click marketplace. As such, it’s a logical next step for a company with an operating history in vertical click marketplaces. Like any entering, there is still the classic chicken and egg scenario of having enough buyers and sellers. Distribution partners will want high CPC’s, and advertisers will want to see quality before coughing up the high CPCs. It’s a slow process, and simply saying, we’re doing it doesn’t mean both sides will come. Luckily, there is enough latent demand from both that BrokersWeb stands a good chance of speeding up this process in order to become a viable player, and they are kicking off the launch with several high profile players on each side at launch. This includes top-tier bidders such as GEICO, Esurance and The Hartford on the advertiser side and AutoInsurance.com and OnlineAutoInsurance.com on the distribution side. We wish them luck as it’s always good to see growth in the space.

    Company Reviews, News & Analysis
  • Buyer / Seller Chicken and Egg

    Comments

    As an advocate for the online customer acquisition industry, I want to see more buyers buying leads. Without buyers, the industry can generate all the leads it wants, but it would be a virtual spinning of the wheels. Consumers aren’t helped, and generators lose not only financially but more so because they can’t help the user. We saw this with mortgage lead generation during the financial crisis. The supply of leads didn’t diminish; the ability to service those leads did.

    “Coverage” is a topic in and off itself, but in short coverage refers to a generators ability to sell leads regardless of location. National brands generally mean greater coverage. There are only so many large, national brands though. For many of the growth areas of lead generation, coverage comes from a greater number of buyers who buy smaller amounts of leads, often with greater restrictions (time of day, geography, etc.). Connecting buyers and sellers is a little bit of a chicken and the egg. As a seller, you want to get paid for your leads, especially as there was a cost to generate them. As the buyer, you don’t want to get ripped off.

    It’s a game of trust that to date has left a bad taste in many people’s mouths when an imbalance occurs.  For an example of the chicken and the egg, read the below, shared by a buyer in a newer vertical (non-mortgage, non-edu):

    With [redacted], they want our business and [redacted] is dealing with someone.  The issue there is that they want 5k up front committed funds.  We have no problem sending them 5k.  Our problem comes in that if they send us a bunch of garbage, we want the ability to cancel and get a refund on the unused balance.  So far, we have been unable to accomplish this.  So, I was hoping to get [redacted] a contact that might waive this provision.  We have been burned a few times by companies promising good leads only to send bad leads.  We have no problem testing a company for 1k or so to see how they do but 5k is a hefty test to take a chance on given our experience.  Make sense?

    Chicken and egg considerations:

    • Pre-pay vs. credit – This is ultimately dictated by leverage. The bigger player gets to decide on average. If you are Quicken Loans, you get to pay on credit. If you are Google AdWords, you get advertisers to pay upfront with a credit card until they reach a certain size. There is no right answer. But, the onus is more on the seller than the buyer. If a seller wants pre-payment (assuming they do not have a credit card, auto-charge system), they and the seller must come to an agreement regarding the product and expectations. That is really the key.
    • Trust – When two parties have an established working relationship, what they really have is trust. If you are a buyer, you know that you will receive a certain quality product, and more importantly, you have assurances of what will happen if those conditions are not met. As the seller, you want to know that the buyer won’t just use you for free product. You also want to know that the buyer won’t blame you for their shortcomings, e.g., too busy to call on all leads, not trying leads more than once, expecting 100% close ratio, etc. Trust is the aim, but trust must be earned. The barrier for trust can be low ($1k versus $5k), and both sides need to earn it.
    • Refund, Refund, Refund – I’m a big believer in a good refund policy. A good refund policy is not whatever the buyer wants, nor is it draconian restrictions. It’s just like buying merchandise at a store. The best retailers generally have some of the best refund policies. Why? Because they believe in their product. The same should be true here. If a seller has a good product, they can afford to stand behind it. Those that require high pre-pays with poor return policies don’t mean they are bad. They too could have been burned by buyers, but I still think the onus is more on the lead generator than end buyer.
    General Thoughts

  • LeadsCon
  • DoublePositive
  • LeadPoint
  • Ampush Media



  • Recent Comments:

    • Ken: Fascinating overview, Jay. I think it'll be unworkable for schools to track and report on how their former...
    • Max: Great summary Jonathan. It seems like so much talk in the lead gen space lately has been about the potential new...
    • FrankVendola: Sisco, The Department of Labor told me that we have to wait 15 days from the 1st to file a complaint. I...
    • Francisco_pool_shark: francisco was here ..what this company did is uncalled for and it should not be tolerated. i...
    • FrankVendola: Dr. Sanjaya Addanki,Ex-C.E.O. Innovation Ads233 Plaza Real, Boca Raton,Florida, USA415-420-0176 July 1,...